Archive | Technology RSS feed for this section

Climate Change

21 Apr

Initiation of the Climate Change Narrative from the originator’s perspective

Maurice Strong was credited for organizing the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, which led to what is now called the IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Maurice, a Canadian who ran away from home at 14, got his first exposure to the UN in 1947 at the age of 18 as an assistant pass officer in the Identification Unit of the Security Section. Living at the time with the Treasurer of the UN, he first met David Rockefeller and learned that the UN’s funds were handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank.

He became an investment analyst at 19,  and VP of Dome Petroleum at 25. After being taken into the fold of Pierre Trudeau, he became president of Power Corporation at 31, and ran the corporation at the age of 35.       

             Maurice was a lifelong socialist who saw the potential of using an environmental movement to fight capitalism and introduce a system of “global governance” that would coordinate all human activity.

IPCC compartmentalizing between the “data” and the “mitigation”

               The IPCC is broken down into 3 Working Groups. “The IPCC Working Group I (WGI) examines the physical science underpinning past, present, and future climate change.” The WGI in other words, controls the data going into the whole process.

             “Working Group II Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability”

             “Working Group III Mitigation of Climate Change”

             It is not within the framework of WGII or WGIII to in any way evaluate the data provided to them. They are simply tasked with, given the data, what can be done to adapt and mitigate the impact that the data forecasts.

Temperature Measurement accuracy on a global basis

           To assign a temperature to the planet at any given time within any minute degree of accuracy is relatively impossible. Even NASA states that when measuring Surface Air Temperature (SAT), “there is no universally accepted correct answer.”

             If instead, we start to look higher up into the atmosphere for temperature readings, an estimate of the temperature variation from sea level to the top of Mt. Everest would be more than 40 degrees.

             And below is a map showing the location of the world’s weather stations as well as where there are no weather station readings as well.

             According to data from “a total of fifteen instruments flying on different satellites” over the years, March 2019 increase in temperature was reported to be up .34 Deg. C. If you go to the NASA/ Goddard Institute website, the current increase is .8 Deg C. Although they say this represents the “global surface temperature”, the actual graph says the data represents “GLOBAL LAND-OCEAN TEMPERATURE INDEX”.

             I reference the statement above, Even NASA states that when measuring Surface Air Temperature (SAT), “there is no universally accepted correct answer.”

Manipulation of data

           As the data that is generated to create the forecasting models is at the heart of any concerns about accuracy, below are two versions of the same data from NASA between 1999 and 2016.

h

Inaccurate Forecasting and predictions

           Forecasting the climate over the last many decades has been a popular topic within the media. Many articles in the sixties and seventies predicted a mini-ice age. The beginning of the Global Warming predictions started June 23rd, 1988 officially when James Hansen told Congress that Global Warming was not approaching, it was here.

             James Hansen’s testimony was sponsored by Senator Timothy Wirth, a democratic senator who later went on to work with Al Gore in supporting the Kyoto Protocol. Wirth announced the U.S.’s commitment to legally binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

             In 2008, Hansen predicted, echoing other scientists that the Arctic would be free of ice in the summer within 5 to 10 years. Below is a graph of the Arctic Sea Ice during the last 4 years on a monthly basis. There is still ice in the Arctic in the summer months.

How much money do “They” hope to get from a carbon tax?

In 2016, More than $28.3 billion in government “carbon revenues” were collected each year in 40 countries and another 16 states or provinces around the world.

             In 2017, the US pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord.

Tech’s Censorship Gameplan

4 Nov

Tech’s Censorship Gameplan

There is a very visible display of censorship being implemented by Big Tech firms. As the disinformation from the Mainstream Media becomes more and more clear, the average person is moving to other sources for news. Now, an attempt to restrict peoples’ online sources to Twitter and Facebook is failing. People are seeking further alternatives to these dystopian social media platforms. Hence, there are now attacks on the very heart of the Tech Industry’s “Free-Space”, that defined by open source software. (The term “open source” refers to something people can modify and share because its design is publicly accessible.)

 

Linux and Microsoft

Two years ago, Microsoft became a Platinum member of the Linux Foundation. At the time, the media portrayed Microsoft as a Champion of Open Source Software even though open source software is in direct competition to Windows. They also placed an Azure Architect onto the board of directors for the Linux Foundation. One year later, Linux adds a “code of conduct”, which basically says that the Linux Foundation should be more inclusive. Attacks on the Founder, Linus Torvalds, for his sometimes hostile comments about developers, as well as a “Contributor Covenant”, formed the basis for the new “code of conduct”. Let there be no doubt about it, this is the beginning of an attack on this Open Source software in order to “contain” its’ implementation.

The Linux Foundation contributors are threatening to pull their code from the open license to the Foundation due to this controversy. As developers grant a license to Linux for them to use their code, that license can be terminated at any time by the developer.

If carried out, ramifications could include large parts of the internet being left vulnerable to exploits, and companies around the world might even inherit bundles of unwanted legal liabilities.

The Code of Conduct is derived from a “Contributor Covenant” written by Coraline…

LinuxSJW

 

Red Hat and IBM

Not to be left in the dust on the Open Source subject, IBM has taken the bold move to purchase Red Hat for $33B. Noting how IBM is proud that they have been partnering with Red Hat for 20 years, and that Red Hat is supposedly open source, it is unclear why this purchase was necessary. Is it possible that Big Tech is working to corral important players in the Linux community to thwart anyone escaping censorship?

 

Gab.ai

One of the most successful alternatives to Twitter and Facebook, is Gab.ai. Gab.ai happens to be Open Source. As such, developers can look at the actual code that Gab uses to insure that no censorship is being implemented that is not consistent with Gab’s code of conduct.

Gab has been a target of Big Tech since its inception. Not until the opportunity of the Pennsylvania Synagogue shooting was it taken down. The shooter posted “I’m going in.”, with no explanation of where he was going, or what he was going to do. That was good enough for PayPal to terminate Gab’s financial transactions on that platform, and for the (Microsoft) Azure Web Hosting service to discontinue hosting Gab.ai on their site

“As we transition to a new hosting provider Gab will be inaccessible for a period of time. We are working around the clock to get Gab.com back online. Thank you and remember to speak freely.
Andrew Torba, CEO Gab.com.”

 

Web Domain Name Removal

As impossible as it may seem, the actual removal of Web Domain Names themselves is the next target. In 2016, The Obama administration transitioned the Internet Domain System to China (ICANN). It’s not impossible to imagine ICANN making statements about a certain website that is promoting “hate speech”, with no clear explanation, with the end result being that that Domain Name no longer exists.

 

Think For Yourself

 

Resignations and Arrests

25 Jun

From those many Americans seeking to provide the facts, I offer up a website produced by many, who collectively have put together their best estimate of several interesting statistics. None of these statistics would have been measurable without the current administration.

The data is provided such that you can query into any level you might have interest in. One might consider the personal decision making that goes into resigning from a job. I suggest that it is very rare.

NeroTheHero

Highlights of the website are on such topics as:

Resignations (Government and Industry)

aaresignations

Sealed Indictments

aasealed indictments

Think For Yourself

The Rice Experiment, Our World Reality

6 Jun

For those that have heard of the Rice Experiment, you might want to check out a fine YouTube video on just that subject. You might think, How Can That Be? :

The world we see may not be entirely what we think. For a more indepth look into Our World, including an embedded video about the Quantum Experiment with Slits, check out Ed’s work from the Outer Light :

Think For Yourself

 

 

 

 

Global Warming Does not exist – The Planet is Getting Colder

11 Nov

The election of Donald Trump to the presidency has raised to the forefront many issues. One of these issues is “Man Made Global Warming”.

chemtrail

Ever since his election, the Massive amount of money poured into the Global Man Made Warming Hoax, (Money coming mostly from the US) is transforming itself into Massive Activity (ONLINE) attempting to protect its turf, and the Cash Cow.

One of the proposed solutions to “Man Made Global Warming“, is to spray metal materials (Barium, Aluminum, Cesium, etc.) into the atmosphere to block the sun’s heat from getting to the surface of the planet.

We see it almost every day in every location (major metropolitan area) of the world.

The problem is: “Man Made Global Warming”, “Man’s CO2 Emissions cause global warming”, “The planet is heating up due to man’s impact”, are all not only wrong, they are contrived. They are contrived to make you believe that through a “carbon tax” the “contrived” problem will be solved.

In reality, the planet is cooling. The most influential impact on the temperature of the planet is the Sun. SUNSPOT activity is diminishing as it does over time and through natural cycles. We are going into a period of time where the global temperatures will decline and the farming patterns in the world will change.

Trump may propose that Myron Ebell head up the EPA. Trump also proposes defunding Climate initiatives through the UN.

Look to the skies to see the progress.

 

GeoEngineering The Planet

19 Oct

One of the greatest subjects not being discussed in the world, and certainly not here in the US, is the subject of geoengineering.

I seem to have recalled the subject of “cloud seeding” even as a child. What came to mind was the TV series Sky King. Looking back on it today, through the miracle of the internet, I come to find the show name of “Rainmaker”. How about that? In 1956, Sky King comes to the rescue of an Indian medicine man threatened with who knows what, if he could not produce rain. With the help of local weathermen, Sky King released silver iodide into the air and saved the day. Although this was a fictional story, it was based on activities going on at that time. Ref : The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control

 CloudSeeding

Fast forwarding to 2014, 58 years after this Sky King episode, most people would know nothing about the topic. Here in the US, the effective reduction in knowledge throughout the population has been extraordinary and effective over the years.

“Dumbness, to paraphrase the late senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, has been steadily defined downward for several decades, by a combination of heretofore irresistible forces. These include the triumph of video culture over print culture; a disjunction between Americans’ rising level of formal education and their shaky grasp of basic geography, science and history; and the fusion of anti-rationalism with anti-intellectualism.” Ref: The Age of American Unreason

But, as time marched on, so did the evolution of technology. Research continued around the world and as the subject of global warming became more prevalent, the possible implementation of such processes gained momentum.

What we know today :

  1. Particles in the atmosphere provide a barrier from the heat of the sun. For some people this seems intuitive, but for a more in depth analysis we can turn to a BBC Horizon production entitled “Global Dimming”.
    1. A scientist studying the impact of vapor trails on climate realized in the days following 9/11, the US average temperature went up as a result of the aircraft ban. This 1 degree increase over 3 days was statistically significant.
    2. Another scientist compared measurements taken during the 1950’s with measurements taken in the 1980’s and found a 22% reduction in solar energy hitting the earth’s surface.
    3. Farmers using pans of water to measure evaporation rates found in the 1990’s that the evaporation rates were declining despite increases in temperature. This was due to the fact that evaporation is more impacted by sunlight hitting the water than the actual air temperature.
    4. The “Global Dimming” was found to be attributed to air pollution. Therefore, areas of the planet that contained more air pollution were “cooler”. And areas with less air pollution were warmer.
  2. Despite Global Dimming, the average temperature of the planet has been increasing over the last 100 years. Interactive map below courtesy of NASA.

 093013_1558_ObamaCareIm1.jpg

It is not clear what activities are being pursued around the world to implement geoengineering activities. There is a YouTube video on geoengineering from the Open Mind Conference 2012 that goes into both the technical aspects and the health aspects of chemicals in the atmosphere. A whistle blower from the US Air Force is telling her story, and one of the most visible and vocal experts on the subject is working to protect his integrity. The forces at work to keep dumbing down the public are doing their very best to discredit these sources and keep the topic off the table for public discussion.

Other references :

Ted Discussion on “Cloud Seeding” : http://www.ted.com/conversations/15127/the_case_for_cloud_seeding.html

New York Times : Geoengineering : Our Last Hope or a False Promise?

Staying the Course

A Brief History of Fracking

4 Sep

In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). It is “… the main federal law that ensures the quality of Americans’ drinking water.” “The law was amended in 1986 and 1996 and requires many actions to protect drinking water and its sources: rivers, lakes, reservoirs, springs, and ground water wells.”

w680[1]

In 2005, Congress passed the 2005 Energy Policy Act. There was a clause written into that act, now commonly referred to as the “Halliburton Clause”, named after Dick Cheney’s relationship to Halliburton. It is interesting that Dick Cheney held no commercial positions in his entire life as a public servant, except for his 1995-2000 tenure as Halliburton’s CEO, served just prior to becoming Vice-President. Below is the “Halliburton Clause”:

SEC. 322. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.

Paragraph (1) of section 1421(d) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h(d)) is amended to read as follows:

(1) UNDERGROUND INJECTION.—The term ‘underground injection’—

(A) means the subsurface emplacement of fluids by well injection; and

(B) excludes—

(i) the underground injection of natural gas for purposes of storage; and

(ii) the underground injection of fluids or propping agents (other than diesel fuels) pursuant to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities.’’.

Now, as hydraulic fracturing around the world is being attributed to groundwater contamination, the industry is paying “hush money” to people who file legal cases against the industry. Drillers are trying to silence any criticism with regards to their activities.

This last week, a more public water issue came to light from a Forbes article concerning the death of some “Federally Protected Fish”.

The relationship between the “Halliburton Clause” in 2005 which gutted the SDWA and groundwater issues from hydraulic fracturing today, is not a coincidence.

 083113_1228_WaterWorks2.gif