Leak vs Hack

22 Apr

The following was derived from the following sources: The Nation, The Senate, Politico, The NYT, The New Yorker, ITV, The House, DC, The CTH, Crowdstrike, CNN, Bloomberg, and The Beast.

Date      Description

5/19/2015          DOJ official Peter Kadzik, writing from personal email account, emails John Podesta to warn of House probe into Clinton’s emails

4/30/2016          DNC IT staff reports suspected hacking on its server(s) to FBI, but fails to turn over the server to the agency, instead hires Crowdstrike

5/15/2016          Crowdstrike claims it investigated DNC hacking and that Russians were responsible; FBI still denied access to server to confirm

6/4/2016            Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post reports, via anonymous sources, that Russians hacked the DNC

6/12/2016          Wikileaks’ Assange warns that Clinton emails will be leaked

6/15/2016          Romanian hacker “Guccifer” claims to have hacked DNC; analysis indicates faux “Russian” fingerprints were inserted into some files

7/5/2016            Romanian hacker “Guccifer” claims to have hacked DNC again (“Guccifer 2.0”)

7/5/2016            Date that forensics indicate that DNC emails were copied by an insider via USB and not hacked via external actors

7/10/2016          DNC staffer Seth Rich murdered in as yet unsolved case

7/24/2016          Clinton aide Robbie Mook claims Russians hacked DNC and Clinton campaign to aid Trump

7/25/2016          FBI announces it will investigate the DNC hack revealed by Wikileaks, Peter Strzok handpicked to lead investigation

7/25/2016          Wikileaks’ Assange says he timed release of DNC emails to impact convention; says “no one” knows who provided emails

7/26/2016          Fusion GPS contractor Steele files new “Dossier” memo stating Russians hacked DNC (two days after Robbie Mook stated the same)

8/30/2016          House Democrats write FBI Director Comey asking him to investigate Trump-Russia collusion in context of DNC hacking

9/14/2016          CIA operative Stefan Halper meets with Papadopoulos, asking “you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?”

9/22/2016          Sen. Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Schiff (D-CA) issue joint statement decrying Russian “hacking”

10/7/2016          Wikileaks releases archive of emails stolen from Clinton operative John Podesta

12/9/2016          CIA tells Congress that they believe the Russians hacked the DNC to help defeat Hillary Clinton’s campaign

12/14/2016        Citing unnamed intelligence officials (likely Strzok or Page), Washington Post reports on “Russian election hacking”

1/2/2017            Wikileaks’ Assange says he guarantees emails did not come from Russia; that Obama administration is trying to undermine Trump

1/11/2017          John Podesta meets with Fusion GPS founder Simpson; but later tells Senate Intelligence Committee he has no knowledge of “dossier”

2/15/2017          McCabe tells Reince Priebus that FBI sees no evidence of Russian “collusion”, but he and Comey refuse to publicly state

6/15/2017          Former DHS head Jeh Johnson tells Congress that the DNC refused to turn over its server so it could throughly investigate “hack”

7/24/2017          Consortium of Intelligence Professionals (VIPS) reports that there is no evidence that Russians hacked DNC (see 7/5/16)

8/9/2017            The Nation reports evidence that DNC insiders, not Russian hackers, compromised Democrat IT systems

1/19/2018          NBC’s Dilanian, with a history of ties to Fusion GPS, markets false claim that Russian “bots” are behind #ReleaseTheMemo hashtag

4/20/2018          DNC files civil lawsuit against Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks for “collusion”; opens up many Democrats to discovery

7/13/2018          SC Mueller relases indictment of 12 Russian GRU agents for allegedly attempting to hack DNC

7/15/2018          Devin Nunes reveals latest Mueller indictment was simply rehashed material from House IC Report and omitted hacks of GOP parties

7/19/2018          Tony Podesta reported to have received use immunity by Special Counsel Mueller to testify against Manafort

7/31/2018          Special Counsel Mueller reported to have referred Tony Podesta and other lobbyists to Manhattan attorneys for prosecution

4/18/2019          AG Barr releases Mueller report finding no collusion and no obstruction. Report omits genesis of probe (“Dossier”), Fusion GPS collusions with Steele, etc.

Cliff Notes Version:

The entire Russian Collusion narrative was contrived in order to hide the fact that Seth Rich provided the DNC emails via a thumb drive to Wikileaks. The “fake news” that Guccifer (The Russians) performed the “Hack” was immediately disproven, then immediately resurfaced as Guccifer 2.0. Unfortunately for the perpetrators, Bill Binney proved the emails were downloaded locally due to their transfer speeds.

**A Leak – Not a Hack**

And if you’ve read to this point, might you notice that Wikileaks in May of 2015 was aware of communications to John Podesta via email. This is almost a year prior to the DNC claims of being potentially hacked. Could it be that Assange has more information not yet released?

Climate Change

21 Apr

Initiation of the Climate Change Narrative from the originator’s perspective

Maurice Strong was credited for organizing the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, which led to what is now called the IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Maurice, a Canadian who ran away from home at 14, got his first exposure to the UN in 1947 at the age of 18 as an assistant pass officer in the Identification Unit of the Security Section. Living at the time with the Treasurer of the UN, he first met David Rockefeller and learned that the UN’s funds were handled by Rockefeller’s Chase Bank.

He became an investment analyst at 19,  and VP of Dome Petroleum at 25. After being taken into the fold of Pierre Trudeau, he became president of Power Corporation at 31, and ran the corporation at the age of 35.       

             Maurice was a lifelong socialist who saw the potential of using an environmental movement to fight capitalism and introduce a system of “global governance” that would coordinate all human activity.

IPCC compartmentalizing between the “data” and the “mitigation”

               The IPCC is broken down into 3 Working Groups. “The IPCC Working Group I (WGI) examines the physical science underpinning past, present, and future climate change.” The WGI in other words, controls the data going into the whole process.

             “Working Group II Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability”

             “Working Group III Mitigation of Climate Change”

             It is not within the framework of WGII or WGIII to in any way evaluate the data provided to them. They are simply tasked with, given the data, what can be done to adapt and mitigate the impact that the data forecasts.

Temperature Measurement accuracy on a global basis

           To assign a temperature to the planet at any given time within any minute degree of accuracy is relatively impossible. Even NASA states that when measuring Surface Air Temperature (SAT), “there is no universally accepted correct answer.”

             If instead, we start to look higher up into the atmosphere for temperature readings, an estimate of the temperature variation from sea level to the top of Mt. Everest would be more than 40 degrees.

             And below is a map showing the location of the world’s weather stations as well as where there are no weather station readings as well.

             According to data from “a total of fifteen instruments flying on different satellites” over the years, March 2019 increase in temperature was reported to be up .34 Deg. C. If you go to the NASA/ Goddard Institute website, the current increase is .8 Deg C. Although they say this represents the “global surface temperature”, the actual graph says the data represents “GLOBAL LAND-OCEAN TEMPERATURE INDEX”.

             I reference the statement above, Even NASA states that when measuring Surface Air Temperature (SAT), “there is no universally accepted correct answer.”

Manipulation of data

           As the data that is generated to create the forecasting models is at the heart of any concerns about accuracy, below are two versions of the same data from NASA between 1999 and 2016.

h

Inaccurate Forecasting and predictions

           Forecasting the climate over the last many decades has been a popular topic within the media. Many articles in the sixties and seventies predicted a mini-ice age. The beginning of the Global Warming predictions started June 23rd, 1988 officially when James Hansen told Congress that Global Warming was not approaching, it was here.

             James Hansen’s testimony was sponsored by Senator Timothy Wirth, a democratic senator who later went on to work with Al Gore in supporting the Kyoto Protocol. Wirth announced the U.S.’s commitment to legally binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

             In 2008, Hansen predicted, echoing other scientists that the Arctic would be free of ice in the summer within 5 to 10 years. Below is a graph of the Arctic Sea Ice during the last 4 years on a monthly basis. There is still ice in the Arctic in the summer months.

How much money do “They” hope to get from a carbon tax?

In 2016, More than $28.3 billion in government “carbon revenues” were collected each year in 40 countries and another 16 states or provinces around the world.

             In 2017, the US pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord.

A Perspective on Mainstream Media

4 Apr

For years every morning the mainstream media were fed the daily talking points from the “3 letter agencies” that formed the basis of “facts” (or more so, the daily narrative) within the US.

Upon the election of Trump, the “propaganda” began to diminish, except for the “hail mary” Russian collusion narrative. After all, who in the US isn’t up for a little Russian propaganda?

Now that the Russian collusion narrative is gone, and the “3 letter agencies” are even further from influencing the narrative, the MSM is in a pickle.

The “adults in the room” are faced with having to (perhaps) tell the truth, and face losing their jobs. As these adults wander into the reality of the real world they uncover stories about Joe Biden. None of the Joe Biden stories are interesting to anyone paying attention over the last decade or so. Not only are the “Creepy” stories well known, but his son’s entrenchment in Ukraine’s oil business is common knowledge.

The powers wanting to control the world, who are actively censoring all that is true, will continue to do so. Those few “adults in the room” that have wandered from the narrative within MSM will either be fading from view, or boot stepping into line. Where they source their “news” from will become increasingly dangerous to their controllers as the “fake” news is more than obvious. If they attempt to dabble in the “truth” much more, they risk exposing it all.

Expect an even more outrageous perspective from MSM as they attempt to secure their position. After all, the MSM has been awarded the 2019 First Amendment Awards, for… “holding the powerful to account, shining a light on corruption, acting as a catalyst for positive change in local communities without denial of access, undue restriction, or fear of attack.”

As this week, Tommy Robinson and Natural News are the latest to be de-personed by Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.

Government Spending/ Accounting Fraud

20 Jan

A Brief History of Watching Where the Money Went

(Accompanying Video Link with Dr. Skidmor and Greg Hunter)

  • For decades, the Federal Reserve has published data on the money supply, and for many years the Fed set targets for money supply growth.
  • In the past two decades, a number of developments have broken down the relationship between money supply growth and the performance of the U.S. economy. (And what were they?)
  • In March 2006, the Board of Governors ceased publishing the M3 monetary aggregate.

 

moneysupply

 

  • By August 2007, the Federal Reserve realized that banks no longer had enough liquidity to function.
  • In 2008 came the financial collapse requiring the Bail-out of Bear Stearns, Fannie MaeFreddie Mac, AIG, and the Credit Markets handled by the major banks

 

Must be Time to Change the Standards –

We Got Caught

 

  • In 2017, Michigan State University economics professor Mark Skidmore discovered $21 trillion missing in the federal budget going back to 1998.
  • In 2017/8, the government attempted an audit of the Department of Defense. The DOD failed the audit.
  • In 2018, the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) posted a new document, which recommended that the government be allowed to misstate and move funds in order to hide expenditures if it is deemed necessary for national security purposes.

Now it is OK to spend Federal money if “somebody?” in any agency of the Federal Government says it’s “for national security purposes”. Then, those expenses are Removed from the Expenditure list and hidden from the Public.

 

Remember to Think For Yourself!

Tech’s Censorship Gameplan

4 Nov

Tech’s Censorship Gameplan

There is a very visible display of censorship being implemented by Big Tech firms. As the disinformation from the Mainstream Media becomes more and more clear, the average person is moving to other sources for news. Now, an attempt to restrict peoples’ online sources to Twitter and Facebook is failing. People are seeking further alternatives to these dystopian social media platforms. Hence, there are now attacks on the very heart of the Tech Industry’s “Free-Space”, that defined by open source software. (The term “open source” refers to something people can modify and share because its design is publicly accessible.)

 

Linux and Microsoft

Two years ago, Microsoft became a Platinum member of the Linux Foundation. At the time, the media portrayed Microsoft as a Champion of Open Source Software even though open source software is in direct competition to Windows. They also placed an Azure Architect onto the board of directors for the Linux Foundation. One year later, Linux adds a “code of conduct”, which basically says that the Linux Foundation should be more inclusive. Attacks on the Founder, Linus Torvalds, for his sometimes hostile comments about developers, as well as a “Contributor Covenant”, formed the basis for the new “code of conduct”. Let there be no doubt about it, this is the beginning of an attack on this Open Source software in order to “contain” its’ implementation.

The Linux Foundation contributors are threatening to pull their code from the open license to the Foundation due to this controversy. As developers grant a license to Linux for them to use their code, that license can be terminated at any time by the developer.

If carried out, ramifications could include large parts of the internet being left vulnerable to exploits, and companies around the world might even inherit bundles of unwanted legal liabilities.

The Code of Conduct is derived from a “Contributor Covenant” written by Coraline…

LinuxSJW

 

Red Hat and IBM

Not to be left in the dust on the Open Source subject, IBM has taken the bold move to purchase Red Hat for $33B. Noting how IBM is proud that they have been partnering with Red Hat for 20 years, and that Red Hat is supposedly open source, it is unclear why this purchase was necessary. Is it possible that Big Tech is working to corral important players in the Linux community to thwart anyone escaping censorship?

 

Gab.ai

One of the most successful alternatives to Twitter and Facebook, is Gab.ai. Gab.ai happens to be Open Source. As such, developers can look at the actual code that Gab uses to insure that no censorship is being implemented that is not consistent with Gab’s code of conduct.

Gab has been a target of Big Tech since its inception. Not until the opportunity of the Pennsylvania Synagogue shooting was it taken down. The shooter posted “I’m going in.”, with no explanation of where he was going, or what he was going to do. That was good enough for PayPal to terminate Gab’s financial transactions on that platform, and for the (Microsoft) Azure Web Hosting service to discontinue hosting Gab.ai on their site

“As we transition to a new hosting provider Gab will be inaccessible for a period of time. We are working around the clock to get Gab.com back online. Thank you and remember to speak freely.
Andrew Torba, CEO Gab.com.”

 

Web Domain Name Removal

As impossible as it may seem, the actual removal of Web Domain Names themselves is the next target. In 2016, The Obama administration transitioned the Internet Domain System to China (ICANN). It’s not impossible to imagine ICANN making statements about a certain website that is promoting “hate speech”, with no clear explanation, with the end result being that that Domain Name no longer exists.

 

Think For Yourself

 

Image

FreeSpeech (or Not)

15 Aug

FreeSpeech

Think For Yourself

Resignations and Arrests

25 Jun

From those many Americans seeking to provide the facts, I offer up a website produced by many, who collectively have put together their best estimate of several interesting statistics. None of these statistics would have been measurable without the current administration.

The data is provided such that you can query into any level you might have interest in. One might consider the personal decision making that goes into resigning from a job. I suggest that it is very rare.

NeroTheHero

Highlights of the website are on such topics as:

Resignations (Government and Industry)

aaresignations

Sealed Indictments

aasealed indictments

Think For Yourself